| 1 |
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 19:11, Joshua Baergen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > MAINTENANCE="~x86" # Maintainer uses x86, package not deemed stable |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I would even suggest not indicating maintainer arch at all. If ATs are |
| 6 |
> going to be responsible for keywording we should blackbox the process to |
| 7 |
> ward off assumptions and laziness. Whether the maintainer thinks it's |
| 8 |
> stable or not on x86 should not affect the AMD64 AT, or even the x86 AT |
| 9 |
> for that matter. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> We could even boil it down to M_STABLE="yes"|"no" at that point |
| 12 |
> (suggestions for variable name welcome). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In this case just adding a new keyword would be easier. It also would mean |
| 15 |
that current tools like imlate would be usable without (significant) change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 23 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives