| 1 |
Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> MAINTENANCE="~x86" # Maintainer uses x86, package not deemed stable |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
I would even suggest not indicating maintainer arch at all. If ATs are |
| 9 |
going to be responsible for keywording we should blackbox the process to |
| 10 |
ward off assumptions and laziness. Whether the maintainer thinks it's |
| 11 |
stable or not on x86 should not affect the AMD64 AT, or even the x86 AT |
| 12 |
for that matter. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We could even boil it down to M_STABLE="yes"|"no" at that point |
| 15 |
(suggestions for variable name welcome). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Joshua Baergen |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives