Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bertini license
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:56:16
Message-Id: CAGfcS_m_TRsKNCRBat_KHuESrS_UbSwN5QrDJ_O4JModoWsErw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: bertini license by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Thomas Kahle posted on Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:58:58 -0600 as excerpted:
3 >> 3. Conveying Modified Versions.
4 >>
5 >> You may modify the Program for your private use only. You may not
6 >> convey, in any manner, a modified version of the Program without written
7 >> consent of all Authors of the Program.
8 >
9 > Does this allow us to create and distribute (separate, as gentoo does)
10 > patches, or not? I'm unclear on that.
11 >
12
13 I can't see how they can restrict what users do with the unmodified
14 sources once somebody has already distributed it. You don't need a
15 license to modify source code - only to distribute source code. We're
16 distributing unmodified sources, so we have a license.
17
18 That's basically the rationale for not going the iceweasel route on
19 another popular package...
20
21 Rich