1 |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Looking to the list of packages still not supporting python 3.5: |
4 |
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gpyutils/34-to-35.txt |
5 |
> |
6 |
|
7 |
I realize a warning will address most of the issue, but when creating |
8 |
lists like these it can be helpful to stick the maintainer names on |
9 |
it, so that maintainers can just search for their name on the wall of |
10 |
shame. :) |
11 |
|
12 |
> |
13 |
> Any issues on trying to go further into implementing this warning? |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
I think warnings in repoman are a great idea. If somebody maintains a |
17 |
package that uses python but isn't seriously into python otherwise |
18 |
they probably won't notice when new versions are available to be |
19 |
tested/etc. The only thing I would suggest is that the warning not be |
20 |
triggered until the python team thinks the new version is ready for |
21 |
testing/etc. I'm not sure if they introduce masked versions into the |
22 |
tree before things settle down or not. If not then this is moot. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Rich |