Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming LyX ebuild - design questions

[Daniel Robbins]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:29:49PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:

> 1. Absolutely necessary packages: x11 & gtk.
> 2. latex2e and a few other things, all of which are in tetex. Lyx can build
> and run without these, but it'd be just a flashy text editor without any
> output capabilities.
> 3. Important utilities like ghostscipt and gv, to use for viewing your output.
> 4. A _very_ large amount of third-party exporters, importers, converters and
> viewers. Enables you to output in many formats etc.
> 5. A few misc tex packages like the one for Hebrew support (which I use) that
> aren't included in tetex.

Well, have it depend on 1, 2 and 3.  We want the base install of our packages
to be fully-functional, and tetex and ghostscript and a postscript viewer would
be needed to actually use Lyx for anything useful.

I'm hoping that the things in 4 and 5 can be built as separate packages rather
than being included in the main Lyx package.  If this is possible, that's what
I would recommend as well.

> Which of these should the ebuild force (i.e. DEPEND on)?
>
> An idea: building a lyx-base ebuild which only depends on x11/gtk and a lyx
> ebuild which does nothing but depends on lyx-bsae, tetex and everything else.
> Maybe with another in-between stage (i.e. a lyx-utils ebuild).
>
> What do you think?

A good solution, since it gives our users more flexibility.

> ----
>
> Another issue: whould Lyx go into app-text (as a latex frontend) or into
> app-office (as a word processor)?
>
> ----

I'd put it in app-text.

> And finally: does anybody here except myself use LyX? Because I can't
> understand how such a great distro cold live so long without this
> all-important package. :-)

Well, that's why we're glad that you're around :))

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@g.o>
President/CEO					http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.