| 1 |
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:46:23 -0600 Lance Albertson |
| 2 |
<ramereth@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| Where is this general consensus documented (other than an email sent |
| 4 |
| out a few days ago). I'd have to go with Paul on this assumption. I |
| 5 |
| don't see the problem with keeping a package such as stu's in portage |
| 6 |
| as long as it doesn't affect other users. Do you honesty expect that |
| 7 |
| we will get a sterile tree out of this? Please focus your QA efforts |
| 8 |
| are more important and visible issues. Going on a witch hunt to fix |
| 9 |
| one problem compared to the bigger issues we know we have is simply |
| 10 |
| silly. This is really starting to look like a power issue rather than |
| 11 |
| a QA issue. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You know, funnily enough, QA has filed a whole heap of bugs on the |
| 14 |
conflicting digest issue. With every other maintainer for bugs we've |
| 15 |
filed, the developer in question has worked with us to fix the issue, |
| 16 |
and thanked us for pointing out the problem. The only reason this one |
| 17 |
has gone so far is because of Stuart repeatedly closing the bug off and |
| 18 |
refusing to discuss alternatives. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives