| 1 |
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well |
| 4 |
>> as Qt5. Some have "+qt4 qt5" in IUSE, others have "qt4 qt5". |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs Qt and thus |
| 7 |
>> lists: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )" |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> but otherwise doesn't prefer one version over the other and both are |
| 12 |
>> equally well supported, should qt4 still be enabled by default? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Follow what upstream developers suggest and/or what works best in |
| 15 |
> practice? At least that's what is usually done for gtk2 vs. gtk3. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Both work equally well. (I'm upstream.) |
Archives