| 1 |
Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015, 21:50:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: |
| 2 |
> On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well |
| 5 |
> >> as Qt5. Some have "+qt4 qt5" in IUSE, others have "qt4 qt5". |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs Qt and thus |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> lists: |
| 10 |
> >> REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )" |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> but otherwise doesn't prefer one version over the other and both are |
| 13 |
> >> equally well supported, should qt4 still be enabled by default? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Follow what upstream developers suggest and/or what works best in |
| 16 |
> > practice? At least that's what is usually done for gtk2 vs. gtk3. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Both work equally well. (I'm upstream.) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
As long qt5 is testing only qt4 makes sense. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Johannes Huber (johu) |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team |
| 25 |
GPG Key ID F3CFD2BD |
Archives