| 1 |
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> This has absolutely zero to do with udev, but the point is that devfs vs |
| 4 |
> udev "flames" cannot be ignored until non udev supported kernels from |
| 5 |
> all arches are removed from the tree. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It also has nothing to do with the naming scheme we use in /dev, as the |
| 8 |
network stuff you mention don't care about /dev, right? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
So, changing the udev naming scheme should not break SPARC, as I am |
| 11 |
trying to migrate back to the standard LSB naming scheme. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
After we get there, then I'll add the persistant naming symlinks that |
| 14 |
it's looking like all distros are going to be agreeing apon in a few |
| 15 |
months... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
thanks, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
greg k-h |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives