| 1 |
On 04:38 Sat 22 Jan , Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
| 2 |
> Assuming we're going to move the git.overlays.gentoo.org repos there as well |
| 3 |
> in the near future, this is the structure i am proposing: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> source |
| 6 |
> - portage-main.git |
| 7 |
> - portage-history.git |
| 8 |
> infra (or sysadmin) |
| 9 |
> - (repo1).git |
| 10 |
> - (repo2).git |
| 11 |
> - ... |
| 12 |
> overlay |
| 13 |
> - project (instead of proj) |
| 14 |
> - sunrise.git |
| 15 |
> - kde.git |
| 16 |
> - ... |
| 17 |
> - personal (merge dev/ & user/) |
| 18 |
> - aballier.git |
| 19 |
> - alexxy.git |
| 20 |
> - ... |
| 21 |
> website |
| 22 |
> - blogs.git |
| 23 |
> - planet.git |
| 24 |
> - forums.git |
| 25 |
> - gstats.git |
| 26 |
> - packages.git |
| 27 |
> - www.git (the gentoo cvs repo) |
| 28 |
> - ... |
| 29 |
> project (includes SOC projects, forks, gentoo projects etc) |
| 30 |
> - devmanual.git |
| 31 |
> - portage.git |
| 32 |
> - ... |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I don't see any particular reason to distinguish between the main tree |
| 36 |
and overlays in this structure. Just do something common for both, like |
| 37 |
tree/ or ebuilds/ or packages/. In the same vein, there's no good reason |
| 38 |
I can think of to discriminate between overlays that are project vs |
| 39 |
personal, since either can be supported or unsupported. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Thanks, |
| 43 |
Donnie |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 46 |
Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 47 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
Archives