| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 5 |
> Hi, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As you may know, beryl is a fork of the famous window- and |
| 8 |
composite-manager |
| 9 |
> compiz (beryl formerly was named compiz-quinnstorm). |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'm maintaining the compiz package and at first thought I'd also take |
| 12 |
beryl, |
| 13 |
> but I'd prefer if someone else could take it. My personal opinion is |
| 14 |
that I |
| 15 |
> don't really see the point of this fork, but there are many users out |
| 16 |
there |
| 17 |
> that seem to like it. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> There are already testing-ebuilds of beryl in the coffee-overlay |
| 20 |
> (www.xgl-coffee.org). There's a guy with the nick nesl247, who regularly |
| 21 |
> hangs out in #gentoo-xgl on freenode that wrote those ebuilds. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If any Gentoo dev wants to take care of beryl, please take bug 150033. You |
| 24 |
> should review those ebuilds in the coffee-overlay together with nesl |
| 25 |
and then |
| 26 |
> add them to portage. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> cu, |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Hanno (hanno@g.o) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
I can think of one reason...it doesn't depend on a ton of gnome stuff |
| 33 |
^.^;; |
| 34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 36 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
iD8DBQFFNAXiSENan+PfizARAhsoAJsHyrTSznDFI0iFWs4HpKL4yjRKAwCfYKyE |
| 39 |
V1MtT7JJxndMIfh9xHKWSOk= |
| 40 |
=rCa9 |
| 41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives