| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 13:52 -0300, Rafael Espíndola wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5/18/05, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > How is it that you know those two greps will catch everything? |
| 4 |
> I don't. In fact I am sure they don't catch everything: given a Turing |
| 5 |
> machine one can replace all halts by a "do something with flex". So it |
| 6 |
> is undecidable if x11 rdepends on flex (or xbill) and one must prove |
| 7 |
> it to be sure. I just want to give some indications that flex is not a |
| 8 |
> dependency. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Another one: |
| 11 |
> epm -ql flex: |
| 12 |
> there is some docs, some infos and a man page. I assume that X doesn't |
| 13 |
> need those. |
| 14 |
> there is a static lib and a header. As far as I know X doesn't compile |
| 15 |
> anything after it is installed. |
| 16 |
> there is the flex binary. As far as I know X doesn't create lexical |
| 17 |
> analyzer after it is installed. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Please don't missunderstand me. I am not being pedantic. I am creating |
| 20 |
> a thin-client with gentoo and would like to make it easier for someone |
| 21 |
> that wants to do that something similar afterwards. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
emerge pxes |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:P |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
OK, so it isn't exactly the same thing, but I don't see much point in |
| 28 |
reinventing the wheel. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 32 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 33 |
Games - Developer |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives