Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>, Davide Pesavento <pesa@g.o>, "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>, Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:56:05
Message-Id: CAATnKFCcO7-_vkdDpGqS079JxhvnrG1qR_c85_6D=9rsnXm+QQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization by "Michał Górny"
1 On 17 June 2016 at 00:04, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > Revision two:
3 >
4 > - Current packages [bug-wranglers@],
5 > - Eclasses [bug-wranglers@],
6 > - Hardened [hardened@],
7 > - New packages [bug-wranglers@],
8 > - Overlays [overlays@],
9 > - Profiles [bug-wranglers@],
10 > - SELinux [selinux@].
11
12
13 "Overlays" seems a little vague as descriptor, might make people think
14 "bugs relating to the overlays" ( ie: like mirroring etc ) as opposed
15 to "Packages in overlays", which might lead people to choose "Current
16 Packages" instead.
17
18 Also, the sort ordering by alphabetical seems an annoying limitation,
19 because things at the top of the list are more likely to be seen ( and
20 used ).
21
22 Ideally you want a sort order like this:
23
24 > - Current packages [bug-wranglers@],
25 > - New packages [bug-wranglers@],
26 > - Overlays [overlays@],
27
28 > - Eclasses [bug-wranglers@],
29 > - Hardened [hardened@],
30 > - Profiles [bug-wranglers@],
31 > - SELinux [selinux@].
32
33
34 Because IME, those top 3 are what you're going to want the most of.
35
36 But I don't know how to make that work.
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 --
44 Kent
45
46 KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL