| 1 |
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:10:04 -0700 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT] |
| 5 |
> > > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 |
| 6 |
> > Incidentally, I drafted a competing GLEP |
| 7 |
> Realize you'ure after keeping it open, but there is more to the tree |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I would like the council to nail down the details of what package |
| 10 |
manager specific data can and cannot be put in gentoo-x86 as well as |
| 11 |
what the requirements and process of replacing or providing an |
| 12 |
alternative to portage will be. Getting the specifics down in writing |
| 13 |
will avoid a lot of headaches down the road as non-portage package |
| 14 |
managers mature. There are a lot of sides to this discussion, almost |
| 15 |
all of the possible view points were expressed on gentoo-dev@g.o. All |
| 16 |
of it is available in the mailing list archives for review, so I'm also |
| 17 |
asking that the subscribers to gentoo-dev@.g.o please refrain from |
| 18 |
starting another flamewar. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-tcort |
Archives