| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT] |
| 3 |
> > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on |
| 4 |
> > the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Incidentally, I drafted a competing GLEP that I posted to -dev |
| 7 |
> (<20060522172314.GB7577@×××××××××××××××××.org>) that was either |
| 8 |
> overlooked in the rest of that thread or ignored because people |
| 9 |
> considered it to be useless; I'm not sure which. In any event, I just |
| 10 |
> want to bring it to the council's attention as an alternative approach. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Realize you'ure after keeping it open, but there is more to the tree |
| 13 |
then just ebuilds- |
| 14 |
1) what sparked it all: profiles |
| 15 |
2) metadata/glsa, |
| 16 |
3) version ordering between ebuilds (is 1.06 greater then 1.051? |
| 17 |
Answer might surprise you ;) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Etc- potential food for thought... |
| 20 |
~harring |
Archives