| 1 |
Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
> Greg KH wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:47:56PM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> Okay, I've got emake modified so that my wrapper script is run, and |
| 7 |
>>> it seems to work. Now, I just need a decently large build that uses |
| 8 |
>>> 'emake' to do a real test, preferably something that has lots of |
| 9 |
>>> subdirs in the build. Can anyone suggest an ebuild? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> gcc? |
| 14 |
>> glibc? |
| 15 |
>> mozilla? |
| 16 |
>> openoffice? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Have fun... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Hmm, not so much fun. Apparently, my wrapper script chokes on complex |
| 22 |
> ebuilds. When building gcc, I got a make error, something about |
| 23 |
> 'makejar'. It then went onto the next make step. I stopped it when it |
| 24 |
> was at 108% ;) My script works just fine for ebuilds such as 'less', but |
| 25 |
> not complex ones. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Are their any methods other than running 'make -n | wc -l' and comparing to the current |
| 28 |
number of lines in 'make' output to figure out how far in the build you are? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Andrew Gaffney |
| 32 |
Network Administrator |
| 33 |
Skyline Aeronautics, LLC. |
| 34 |
636-357-1548 |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives