1 |
On 02/09/2017 12:25 PM, Ben Kohler wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o |
5 |
> <mailto:zlg@g.o>> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I support the idea of a profile-set variable that determines whether or |
8 |
> not IUSE is respected. Minimalists get their systems faster, we get |
9 |
> something that adds to Gentoo's versatility and an additional profile. |
10 |
> Of course, we should be asking the anti-IUSE people if that would be |
11 |
> good enough to make the profiles/systems they want possible. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> -- |
14 |
> Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
15 |
> OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net <http://keys.gnupg.net> |
16 |
> fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Can't this already be accomplished by modifying the USE_ORDER variable? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -Ben |
21 |
That's a great question. Based on a cursory look at make.conf's manpage, |
22 |
USE_ORDER without 'pkginternal' will ignore IUSE defaults as intended. |
23 |
|
24 |
So if we change that from what I assume to be the default (found in the |
25 |
manpage), a minimalist profile (or system) should be using: |
26 |
|
27 |
USE_ORDER = "env:pkg:conf:defaults:repo:env.d" |
28 |
|
29 |
If that gets combined with a profile meant explicitly for this |
30 |
bare-bones use case, then I don't see why we can't make that happen. It |
31 |
just requires someone who knows the use case to build the profile. |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks for pointing this out! |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
37 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
38 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |