| 1 |
tis 2001-10-09 klockan 12.08 skrev Dan Armak: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 09 October 2001 11:43, you wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Sorry I was unclear, I was wondering what "feature"-changes there were |
| 4 |
> > between the two. Or are they the exact same just distributed with |
| 5 |
> > different licenses? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's right. Up to qt-2.x (not sure which) there were separate packages, |
| 8 |
> qt-x11-free, -proffesional and -enterprise. They were unified into qt-x11 |
| 9 |
> which allows you to install a license file. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Ok, thanks for enlightening me. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > Ok, didn't know the full name was qt-x11 (thought that someone named it |
| 14 |
> > so in portage to make it more clear that it was the x11-build). What |
| 15 |
> > this had to do with GNOME I dunno and why it would ever be called GDE. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> GDE=Gnome Desktop Environment. I just gave an example of unnecessary |
| 18 |
> shortening of names, a bad one :-). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I understand you meant that but the name is GNOME (which is a |
| 21 |
shortening). I thought that the distributed package was named 'qt' and |
| 22 |
not qt-<backend>. Just as Gtk+ isn't distributed gtk+-x11, in Gtk+ 2.0 |
| 23 |
all backends are going into the same tarball and you choose (with |
| 24 |
configure-flag) which backend to build. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Mikael Hallendal micke@×××××××××××.se |
| 31 |
CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ |
| 32 |
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918 |
Archives