Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>, gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:19:00
Message-Id: 57129018.6070906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ by Rich Freeman
1 On 4/16/16 3:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Congratulations! ... But why would anyone...
5 >
6 > Not really picking on you in particular, but this is not the first
7 > snarky comment on a commit we've seen today.
8 >
9 > If somebody makes a mistake, just point it out. I think we can all
10 > appreciate that glibc shouldn't break even in ~arch, and that libressl
11 > needs a USE flag due to the whole ABI situation.
12 >
13 > I can't remember the last time I just factually pointed out a mistake
14 > to somebody that they didn't just fix it. When there are real
15 > controversies then there are ways to escalate. We don't need to
16 > manufacture them out of accidents.
17 >
18
19 I know it will cause rebuild but we are moving towards openssl:0=
20 dependency. Please look at the discussion on bug #569112.
21
22 --
23 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
24 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
25 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
26 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
27 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>