1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On April 12, 2004 12:59 pm, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
5 |
> Todd Berman wrote: |
6 |
> > On Mon, 2004-12-04 at 11:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
7 |
> >>Troy Dack wrote: |
8 |
> >>>Another point against a monolithic zip containing all the ebuilds (or |
9 |
> >>>even per directory zips) is the performance hit that slow machines would |
10 |
> >>>take, not everybody runs gentoo on a 2GHz plus machine (eg: my little |
11 |
> >>>PII-400 in the corner) |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >>Or my little P233 Thinkpad... |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > And with the current setup of writing thousands of 1K files that little |
16 |
> > p233 thinkpad really flys i bet... |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm not sure if that was supposed to be sarcastic, but yes, it does fly. It |
19 |
> only takes slightly longer to sync than my Athlon 1.3GHz desktop. The only |
20 |
> part that takes forever is updating the portage cache. That's why I just |
21 |
> use a NFS shared portage tree from my desktop machine now. |
22 |
|
23 |
That isn't a solution though. |
24 |
|
25 |
"Gentoo, the distributed home computer operating system. " |
26 |
|
27 |
"Gentoo, takes 2379MIPS to sync within a week." |
28 |
|
29 |
etc... |
30 |
|
31 |
I mean if it's slow now what happens in [say] 2008 when portage has 160k files |
32 |
or something... I don't know exactly how portage works but from when I |
33 |
started using gentoo [~60k files in portage] to now [~80k files in portage] |
34 |
it's definitely not just a linear amount slower. |
35 |
|
36 |
While I'm at it what of security? I mean how do I know the files on the |
37 |
mirror I get them from are from the CVS? |
38 |
|
39 |
Tom |
40 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
41 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
42 |
|
43 |
iD8DBQFAes1FsP+tEsHHY0ARApG8AKCQhFU2mkTIHo8LIB8pkZzINmRQaACcDuC9 |
44 |
c8XWfm8lMvKVXobONXSoWLE= |
45 |
=D9Cy |
46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |