1 |
Lukasz Damentko <rane@g.o> said: |
2 |
> Fair enough. Let me wrap up the IRC part. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 1. I'd like to ask Council to discuss possible reactions to our |
5 |
> developer being banned from Freenode without providing us with a |
6 |
> reason. The situation looks like one of Freenode staffers overreacted |
7 |
> over something Chris said during previous Council meeting and banned |
8 |
> him to prevent him from attending next meetings when he was supposed |
9 |
> to provide more information on the CoC topic. The ban was removed |
10 |
> after an hour, but they still refuse to provide us with reasons for it |
11 |
> which looks like (mostly because we weren't shown any sane |
12 |
> justification for the ban) a cover up operation. It would be good if |
13 |
> Council officially protested against that ban and demanded a detailed |
14 |
> explanation from Freenode staff. |
15 |
|
16 |
Due to their privacy policy I don't think we'll ever be able to get |
17 |
adequate explanations from Freenode staff when our devs are banned. |
18 |
|
19 |
> 2. I want Council to consider moving their meetings somewhere where |
20 |
> third parties can't control who in Gentoo can attend and who can't. |
21 |
> Like our own small and created just for this purpose IRC server. A |
22 |
> situation when a third party may disallow our developer from attending |
23 |
> a meeting without even telling us why isn't the healthiest one. We |
24 |
> should be independent from such decisions of third parties so they |
25 |
> can't politically influence Council decisions by removing people who |
26 |
> are inconvenient for them. Now when it (most probably) happened once, |
27 |
> we have no other choice but to believe it's possible it will happen |
28 |
> again. |
29 |
|
30 |
If for some reason a developer was unable to attend a meeting due to |
31 |
being klined or the internet being FUBAR'd, I know that I have my IM |
32 |
details available in LDAP for that dev to be able to contact me, or they |
33 |
could send the entire council an email. I don't think setting up our own |
34 |
IRC server is worth the trouble for this small purpose. |
35 |
|
36 |
> 3. I want Council to consider creating and using irc.gentoo.org alias |
37 |
> instead of irc.freenode.net in our docs, news items and so on. The |
38 |
> alias would allow us to move out of the network more easily should we |
39 |
> ever decide to do so. Debian did exactly the same a couple of months |
40 |
> ago prior to them moving out to OFTC |
41 |
> (http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060604) so maybe it would be a |
42 |
> good idea to have this for Gentoo too. Infra (Shyam Mani) say it isn't |
43 |
> a problem at all to create and maintain it, we in fact already have |
44 |
> something like this pointing at Freenode, it would be just a question |
45 |
> of updating that alias and updating our docs with it. It would |
46 |
> increase our independence from Freenode and make future network |
47 |
> switching much easier should we ever decide it's time to part our ways |
48 |
> with our current IRC service provider. |
49 |
|
50 |
I like this idea. spb rose some concerns in the meeting with regards to |
51 |
some users thinking that if they came onto irc.gentoo.org and joined #java |
52 |
that it would be a Gentoo java channel, but it doesn't seem like |
53 |
Freenode considers this to be much of a problem. For evidence of this: |
54 |
http://freenode.net/acknowledgements.shtml |
55 |
|
56 |
They thank projects for pointing their domains to them, so I believe |
57 |
that the network as a whole shouldn't have a problem with this. If |
58 |
someone thinks I'm misunderstanding what they mean on that page, please |
59 |
let me know. |
60 |
|
61 |
Thanks, |
62 |
|
63 |
-- |
64 |
Mark Loeser |
65 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
66 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
67 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |