| 1 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800 |
| 2 |
Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point |
| 5 |
> users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches |
| 6 |
> there (in lieu of user_patches.) The end result is that if users apply |
| 7 |
> the patches, they will get an unsupported setup. There is a fear as |
| 8 |
> well, that the patches may damage cards (since the patches are not |
| 9 |
> supported by the vendor.) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
We're talking about updating an include path here. Some files moved. I don't |
| 12 |
think that justifies breaking stable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gcc-porting |
| 17 |
toolchain, wxwidgets learn a language baby, it's that kind of place |
| 18 |
@ gentoo.org where low card is hunger and high card is taste |
Archives