| 1 |
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 11:12:47 +0200 |
| 2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Problems: |
| 5 |
> > - atomic/well-ordered commits that span packages, eclasses and |
| 6 |
> > profiles/ directories. (Esp. committing to eclasses and then |
| 7 |
> > packages afterwards). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This can be done with a single commit to the rsync tree script, and it |
| 10 |
> doesn't necessarily need git repos. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
And have you considered the function PoV on this? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
With clean git repo: few commits, git push |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
With your split-tree: a lot of commits to random packages, potentially |
| 17 |
using random VCS-es, a lot of pushes, hacking some magical rsync stuff |
| 18 |
and finally guessing what went wrong this time |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives