1 |
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:33:06PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:37 -0800 Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | It's really pretty simple- get off your butt and chip in if you want |
5 |
> | it, else you're on _our_ timeline (eg, we implement it when we deem |
6 |
> | it sane/ready to go). |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Is Portage development done to support the needs of those of us who |
9 |
> provide the tree, or is the tree expected to be restricted to whatever |
10 |
> Portage developers feel like implementing? |
11 |
|
12 |
Personally, I'd state anyone who thinks we're implementing only what |
13 |
we find fun to do is trolling something fierce, but I'm also a portage |
14 |
dev thus my views are a bit different. |
15 |
|
16 |
Regardless, ciaran's own statement via irc "that the portage devs are |
17 |
hurting gentoo by ignoring certain requests" still harkens right back |
18 |
to my point- if you believe it to be the case, nagging/bitching ain't |
19 |
going to improve it in anyway. |
20 |
|
21 |
People, you've got the source. |
22 |
|
23 |
You want it and think we're moving to slow/being tools/incompetent |
24 |
jackasses, whatever the belief, _you_ can do something about it that |
25 |
results in actual progress- I already stated the ways to help in my |
26 |
last email. |
27 |
|
28 |
So... again, you want it, help, or kindly sit back and wait for it to |
29 |
be implemented on our timeline. |
30 |
~harring |