Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:19:41
Message-Id: 1184336040.32429.6.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes by Seemant Kulleen
1 On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 03:11 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > Thanks for expressing your point of view that clearly. I stand with
3 > you. Gentoo, for a while, has been taking itself *way* too seriously.
4 > Perhaps that mentality is part of the inevitability of a project's
5 > evolution through its own stages of life.
6
7 I consider it growing up. Do we want businesses to run and base their
8 service/product offerings on Gentoo? If so we must take it seriously.
9 Otherwise we are just a hobby distro for the uber geeks.
10
11 What makes a developer only -dev list any different than developers only
12 having a voice on #gentoo-dev?
13
14 --
15 William L. Thomson Jr.
16 Gentoo/Java

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>