| 1 |
On Sunday 24 August 2003 18:44, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
> begin quote |
| 3 |
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:32:22 -0500 |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > lpr |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> But, Am I the only one who sees an advantage in moving the default |
| 8 |
> profiles to LSB compliance, and providing an alternated "light" one for |
| 9 |
> the cases that want them? (heck, if you dislike dhcpcd I'm pretty sure |
| 10 |
> you don't want the bloat of glibc either, go for uclibc. ;) but sarcasm |
| 11 |
> aside, the suggestion is serious. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, I can see the advantage of mimmicing the LSB, but for example lpr does |
| 14 |
not make sense without a printer, and setting up a printer takes configuring |
| 15 |
anyway so I don't feel it should be part of system |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 23 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives