| 1 |
"C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> posted |
| 2 |
48D0177B.2010002@×××××××××.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Sep 2008 |
| 3 |
22:30:51 +0200: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> 1) Add a symlink in GNU patch ebuild to symlink patch to gpatch |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You mean the other way, right? gpatch -> patch , since we already have |
| 8 |
patch, and need gpatch if the below is to work. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Or did you mean change the sys-devel/patch ebuild so the executable is |
| 11 |
named gpatch instead of patch, then create a symlink patch -> gpatch as |
| 12 |
suggested above. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> 2) Change references to patch in eclass/eutils.eclass to gpatch |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This makes sense to me. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 20 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 21 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives