| 1 |
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer |
| 4 |
>> ---------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
>> - The herd field is not used. |
| 6 |
>> - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee. |
| 7 |
>> This is important for all the herds that have aliases that are NOT the |
| 8 |
>> same as their herd name! |
| 9 |
>> This diverges from existing manual practice, to avoid unnecessary |
| 10 |
>> duplicate mail, and means that existing metadata may need a cleanup. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It should take devaway into account. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into |
| 15 |
account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly |
| 16 |
assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's |
| 17 |
not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so, |
| 18 |
at some point |
Archives