| 1 |
On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer |
| 5 |
> >> ---------------------------------------------- |
| 6 |
> >> - The herd field is not used. |
| 7 |
> >> - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee. |
| 8 |
> >> This is important for all the herds that have aliases that are NOT the |
| 9 |
> >> same as their herd name! |
| 10 |
> >> This diverges from existing manual practice, to avoid unnecessary |
| 11 |
> >> duplicate mail, and means that existing metadata may need a cleanup. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > It should take devaway into account. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into |
| 16 |
> account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly |
| 17 |
> assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's |
| 18 |
> not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so, |
| 19 |
> at some point |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I meant if a maintainer is away, his/her herd should be assignee with |
| 22 |
him/her CCed. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Duy |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives