| 1 |
On 4/27/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > It should take devaway into account. |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into |
| 7 |
> > account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly |
| 8 |
> > assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's |
| 9 |
> > not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so, |
| 10 |
> > at some point |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I meant if a maintainer is away, his/her herd should be assignee with |
| 13 |
> him/her CCed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Eh; if the maintainer has been away for months (a.k.a MIA), then |
| 16 |
yeah... otherwise, no reason for this if someone's away for a week. |
| 17 |
Sorry to disappoint you and others here, but the scripts will lack |
| 18 |
artificial intelligence and frankly I don't see what exactly are you |
| 19 |
expecting from this whole thing. Anyway, good luck. ;) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Jakub Moc |
| 23 |
Email: jakub.moc@×××××.com |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives