1 |
OK Virgil, |
2 |
|
3 |
Virgil Dupras <vdupras@g.o> writes: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I |
6 |
> simply fixed the xmw-abandoned netsurf package which had been broken for |
7 |
> 3 months prior to that (and by broken, I don't mean only on Prefix. Why |
8 |
> talk about 1-1 features in those situations?). Fixing packages without |
9 |
> touching eclasses doesn't require gentoo-dev review. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Also, netsurf doesn't have any prefix keyword. Some of the lower-level |
12 |
> libs have ~m68k-mint, but it isn't clear why because the only |
13 |
> non-netsurf revdep to those libs is net-libs/libwebsockets and it isn't |
14 |
> keyworded for prefix either. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Please, open a ticket on the appropriate package with a description |
17 |
> of an actual breakage and I'll be deligthed to address it. |
18 |
|
19 |
Well, all in all, thank you for stepping up to take care of |
20 |
netsurf-buildsystem. You're good. |
21 |
|
22 |
Yours, |
23 |
Benda |