| 1 |
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:34:56 +0800 |
| 2 |
Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> This is a serious regression for Prefix and caught a lot of users |
| 5 |
> without a warning. Could you please discuss on this kind of changes in |
| 6 |
> the mailing list beforehand? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I |
| 9 |
simply fixed the xmw-abandoned netsurf package which had been broken for |
| 10 |
3 months prior to that (and by broken, I don't mean only on Prefix. Why |
| 11 |
talk about 1-1 features in those situations?). Fixing packages without |
| 12 |
touching eclasses doesn't require gentoo-dev review. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Also, netsurf doesn't have any prefix keyword. Some of the lower-level |
| 15 |
libs have ~m68k-mint, but it isn't clear why because the only |
| 16 |
non-netsurf revdep to those libs is net-libs/libwebsockets and it isn't |
| 17 |
keyworded for prefix either. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Please, open a ticket on the appropriate package with a description |
| 20 |
of an actual breakage and I'll be deligthed to address it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Virgil |
Archives