| 1 |
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> +1. I want these profiles to *staty*. I am using this profile on my |
| 3 |
> "home boxes". It is the most minimal profile as the rest of the |
| 4 |
> profiles pull in too much useless stuff. What is wrong with these |
| 5 |
> profiles anyway? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Looking at the actual profiles themselves, using server vs the base |
| 8 |
profile makes these changes: |
| 9 |
USE="-perl -python snmp truetype xml" |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So, you're getting less perl/python support, but you're getting snmp, |
| 12 |
truetype, and xml. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I think overall you'd get a more minimal setup with the base profile, |
| 15 |
and if you really want -perl/-python you could just set those in your |
| 16 |
USE. I'd think that your home box would be more likely to benefit |
| 17 |
from perl/python support on packages than having snmp support. But, |
| 18 |
to each his own... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'd be all for there being an actual minimal profile, but I don't |
| 21 |
think server really is that. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives