| 1 |
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:16:08PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote: |
| 2 |
> >init(8) itself sends the TERM and KILL signals when changing runlevels, and |
| 3 |
> >there's no way around that, save patching init. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> redhat does it the other way round. redhat first calls all init.d |
| 6 |
> scripts and then the TERM and KILL signals are send - so did redhat |
| 7 |
> patch init? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I don't know; I don't use RHL or RHEL. However, I suspect they work just |
| 10 |
as Gentoo does. init(8) first signals the processes in its process group, |
| 11 |
so you'll see: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
INIT: Switching to runlevel 0 |
| 14 |
INIT: Sending processes the TERM signal |
| 15 |
INIT: Sending processes the KILL signal |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
on the console. Then init runs the RHL shutdown scripts, the final one of |
| 18 |
which probably sends all processes SIGTERM and SIGKILL, just like Gentoo's |
| 19 |
/etc/init.d/halt.sh does. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives