Archives
Archives
| From: | "Sven Köhler" <skoehler@×××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: strange gentoo shutdown sequence | ||
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2004 15:21:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | c78c9j$fng$2@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence by splite-gentoo@sigint.cs.purdue.edu | ||
| 1 | > init(8) itself sends the TERM and KILL signals when changing runlevels, and |
| 2 | > there's no way around that, save patching init. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | redhat does it the other way round. redhat first calls all init.d |
| 5 | scripts and then the TERM and KILL signals are send - so did redhat |
| 6 | patch init? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: strange gentoo shutdown sequence | splite-gentoo@××××××××××××××××.edu |