Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jonathan Smith <smithj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:29:36
Message-Id: 42B33239.1010408@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project by "Jan Kundrát"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Jan Kundrát wrote:
5 > Christian Hartmann wrote:
6 >
7 >>Feedback is highly appreciated.
8 >
9 >
10 > IMHO if you don't require moderators of Local Forums to accept and
11 > follow same guidelines as the global moderators, you're actually against
12 > the point of "Moderator as Gentoo authority".
13 >
14 > Same applies for current moderators. I think that it's not so hard to
15 > complete the staff quiz, btw, and there shouldn't be a need for the
16 > one-month-long probation for existing moderators.
17 >
18 > But I'm not a Gentoo developer.
19 >
20 > WKR,
21 > -jkt
22 >
23
24 I agree that current moderatory should be greatly encouraged to take the
25 quiz and become official.
26
27 - -smithj
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
30 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
31
32 iD8DBQFCszI5l5AvwDPiUowRApzWAJ48d0wd+dqk2Otd10LyTj8PaUGKVwCfVBlo
33 prXYkl43jett+nAnCouZVms=
34 =Sbi+
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project Haas Wernfried <w.haas@×××××××××××××××××××.at>