| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:27:37PM -0400, Jonathan Smith wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 3 |
> > IMHO if you don't require moderators of Local Forums to accept and |
| 4 |
> > follow same guidelines as the global moderators, you're actually against |
| 5 |
> > the point of "Moderator as Gentoo authority". |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The main problem with some of the local forums is that not everyone |
| 8 |
there speaks English (well). That being a requirement would mean we'd |
| 9 |
have to kick off people doing a good job just because they don't |
| 10 |
fulfill a requirement for official Gentoo staff. That's why they were |
| 11 |
excluded and becoming an official member is optional. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > Same applies for current moderators. I think that it's not so hard to |
| 14 |
> > complete the staff quiz, btw, and there shouldn't be a need for the |
| 15 |
> > one-month-long probation for existing moderators. |
| 16 |
> I agree that current moderatory should be greatly encouraged to take the |
| 17 |
> quiz and become official. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I do so as well, but we cannot force it on them. If i have to choose |
| 20 |
if someone who has done great work has to become offical and decides |
| 21 |
to leave because of that or just stays non-offical, i'll choose the |
| 22 |
second option. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
In any case all members of the moderation staff, official or not, are |
| 25 |
bound to our moderation guidelines anyway. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
cheers, |
| 28 |
Wernfried (amne) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Fppmpppffpppmpfpffmffmppmpm Mfpmmmmmmfmm |
| 32 |
fpp.mfpmmmmmmfmm@×××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.mmmfmp |
| 33 |
mfpfmpfmppfm://fpfppffpmmpppff.ppmfmfmpm.mmmfmp/~mmmppmpppmpppppmffppfppp/ |
| 34 |
http://www.namesuppressed.com/kenny/ |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives