| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Michał Górny schrieb: |
| 5 |
>> I prefer the |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> format even though not all bug trackers are running Bugzilla. "Bug: " |
| 10 |
>> works fine with me too, and we could make |
| 11 |
>> "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=" optional for Gentoo bugs, |
| 12 |
>> to accommodate for those who insist on not typing so much. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Thanks, this is exactly what I wanted. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> "Fixes", "References", "Bug" are all good. "Bugzilla" goes against your |
| 17 |
> proposal diverging keyword depending on bug tracker software. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'd use "Bugzilla" somewhat inaccurately even for non-Bugzilla bugtrackers. |
| 21 |
But of course that is just a minor detail, "Bug" is fine too. "Fixes" is |
| 22 |
maybe misleading in certain cases (e.g. a partial fix or revert). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Best regards, |
| 26 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlXI8QsACgkQ+gvH2voEPRCtoACfeEsi/dn7bpCvaaqzYEMozCX0 |
| 33 |
4tsAn2BIsNAK1R9ZBrQfLvEPqi9161QS |
| 34 |
=09+F |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives