| 1 |
On 02-04-2008 21:21:25 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Would it make more sense to just make a policy that failure to maintain |
| 3 |
> packages that you're maintainer on will result in getting removed as the |
| 4 |
> maintainer, with said packages going up for grabs? Devs who keep claiming |
| 5 |
> packages only to allow them to bitrot can be booted. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On other projects I sometimes see a remark such as: |
| 8 |
"Maintainer time-out, committing the fix as in bug #bla" |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Maybe that is a bit less intrusive as dropping the maintainer entirely. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 15 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives