| 1 |
Fabian Groffen kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> On 02-04-2008 21:21:25 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Would it make more sense to just make a policy that failure to maintain |
| 4 |
>> packages that you're maintainer on will result in getting removed as the |
| 5 |
>> maintainer, with said packages going up for grabs? Devs who keep claiming |
| 6 |
>> packages only to allow them to bitrot can be booted. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> On other projects I sometimes see a remark such as: |
| 9 |
> "Maintainer time-out, committing the fix as in bug #bla" |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Maybe that is a bit less intrusive as dropping the maintainer entirely. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The process of coming back should be quick and easy as the quizzes don't |
| 15 |
really change that much. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Regards, |
| 18 |
Petteri |
Archives