| 1 |
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 21:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Somehow I don't think |
| 3 |
> we're the ones spreading the FUD here. |
| 4 |
Should I call you an hypocrite or you'll apologise after calling me a FUD |
| 5 |
spreader? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> (Not that I'm opposed to BSD, as you know. I just find it rather |
| 8 |
> strange that you're using a "big change" argument here...) |
| 9 |
Let's see: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 12 |
> ++ for Halcy0n, and adding from an ebuild maintainer some more, many parts |
| 13 |
> of the current tree are at a minimum understaffed, if we're going to have |
| 14 |
> to start dealing with bugs coming from users experimenting with something |
| 15 |
> else but portage, we'd be _really_ taken over. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I didn't say "big", I didn't say "change", I didn't even refer to the profile |
| 18 |
itself. I agreed with Halcy0n's post and I said that dealing with bugs that |
| 19 |
might be coming out of portage's misbehaviours being depended on might make |
| 20 |
us get taken over by bugs. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
So I didn't appeal to any "big change" argument, and you're still missing your |
| 23 |
point. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 27 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives