Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:41:22
Message-Id: 87h8xto2ug.fsf@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by Sam Jorna
1 Hi,
2
3 Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o> writes:
4
5 > Wouldn't it make more sense to make Gentoo *more* attractive to run in
6 > corporate environments, rather than simply saying "We're not RHEL so why
7 > bother"?
8 >
9 > People do use Gentoo in production environments, both personally and
10 > professionally, even if it is those that have more investment in doing
11 > so than the average IT Joe. By removing stable, we would be reducing the
12 > potential arguments for the few who do want to use Gentoo in that sort
13 > of environment. We would be becoming more of a niche distro.
14 >
15 > "Hey, lets try Gentoo - it's really configurable."
16 > "What's their stable policy? How often does it break?"
17 > "Stable? What's that?"
18
19 I agree with Sam. I see several cases in academia (mainly astrophysics
20 and particle physics) that Gentoo stable is used and performs well.
21 Professtional use of Gentoo should be actively supported and even
22 advocated.
23
24 Benda

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature