1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o> writes: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make Gentoo *more* attractive to run in |
6 |
> corporate environments, rather than simply saying "We're not RHEL so why |
7 |
> bother"? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> People do use Gentoo in production environments, both personally and |
10 |
> professionally, even if it is those that have more investment in doing |
11 |
> so than the average IT Joe. By removing stable, we would be reducing the |
12 |
> potential arguments for the few who do want to use Gentoo in that sort |
13 |
> of environment. We would be becoming more of a niche distro. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> "Hey, lets try Gentoo - it's really configurable." |
16 |
> "What's their stable policy? How often does it break?" |
17 |
> "Stable? What's that?" |
18 |
|
19 |
I agree with Sam. I see several cases in academia (mainly astrophysics |
20 |
and particle physics) that Gentoo stable is used and performs well. |
21 |
Professtional use of Gentoo should be actively supported and even |
22 |
advocated. |
23 |
|
24 |
Benda |