1 |
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
3 |
>> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
>> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Better suited for base-system, maybe? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> > sys-fs/jfsutils : |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> sounds fine for both. generally fs tools probably should live under |
13 |
> base-system for consistency. |
14 |
|
15 |
Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed |
16 |
under the base-system project because the base-system project members |
17 |
intend to maintain it. I don't want to see packages placed into |
18 |
projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those |
19 |
projects if it means they'll just be neglected. |
20 |
|
21 |
I have no idea which is the case here. If the base-system maintainers |
22 |
want to maintain these two packages, have at it! If not, leave it as |
23 |
maintainer-needed. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Rich |