1 |
On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
2 |
> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello, everyone. |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to |
6 |
> > our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding |
7 |
> > it and looking for new maintainers for its packages. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all |
10 |
> > of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be |
11 |
> > automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of |
12 |
> > packages needing maintainers. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers: |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> |
17 |
> [snip] |
18 |
> |
19 |
> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Better suited for base-system, maybe? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> [snip] |
24 |
> |
25 |
> > sys-fs/jfsutils : |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by them. |
28 |
|
29 |
sounds fine for both. generally fs tools probably should live under |
30 |
base-system for consistency. |
31 |
-mike |