1 |
Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> posted |
2 |
20080606013721.06a5c36f@××××××××××××××.us, excerpted below, on Fri, 06 |
3 |
Jun 2008 01:37:21 +0000: |
4 |
|
5 |
>> 2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending |
6 |
>> appeals what policy do you propose ? |
7 |
|
8 |
> I'd also add two new requirements: |
9 |
> 1. Any appeal must be heard and decided within xxx days; |
10 |
|
11 |
Not to seem disrespectful, but "Or what?" |
12 |
|
13 |
Seriously, "or the appeal automatically succeeds."? Or, "or the appeal |
14 |
automatically fails."? Does it matter what the appeal is (the scope of |
15 |
the question wasn't limited to the current situation, so the answer must |
16 |
apply in broad scope as well)? |
17 |
|
18 |
I'd urge being careful here, because it a similar failure to spell out |
19 |
the details that triggered what amounted to a bit of a constitutional |
20 |
crisis, tho the worst now seems past, I believe with the correct decision |
21 |
being made. (My thanks to all involved.) |
22 |
|
23 |
So the "or what" matters, as does the scope, which is why I'm asking |
24 |
about it. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
28 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
29 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |