1 |
Well, I had already done one. |
2 |
|
3 |
See: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828 for bogofilter and |
4 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8827 for Judy. |
5 |
|
6 |
I had been waiting for the "unfreeze" for them to be included and then |
7 |
for my exams to finish so I could "Gentoo-ise" them more. Based on the |
8 |
numbers, you will see they have been in the pipe along time |
9 |
|
10 |
I like your ebuilds, but they are dups of mine. They are more |
11 |
"gentoo-ised" than mine. |
12 |
|
13 |
So while I am happy that yours came along, I would have preferred you |
14 |
check to see if existing work was there and work on that and test |
15 |
that. All your difference look good and I will be sure to test them. |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks. |
18 |
|
19 |
Evan. |
20 |
|
21 |
On 2002.11.09 06:03 Javier Marcet wrote: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> A couple hours ago I committed a new ebuild for a fast spam filter |
24 |
> based |
25 |
> on Bayesian filters, popular since the publication of Paul Graham's |
26 |
> paper A Plan For Spam: http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html |
27 |
> |
28 |
> You can find the ebuild on bugzilla: |
29 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10435 |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I've only tested it on x86 and it's working pretty well, I much prefer |
32 |
> it over all the other spam-filters I've tried, including other |
33 |
> Bayesian-based ones. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> With bogofilter's ebuild there is also one for Judy's libraries, |
36 |
> general |
37 |
> purpose dynamic array's C libraries which claims to be much faster and |
38 |
> efficient than other data structures schemes, like binary trees, |
39 |
> B-trees, linked lists, ... |
40 |
> This I am interested in people on other architectures to see if it |
41 |
> works, since the autoconf version I used on the ebuild seems a work in |
42 |
> progress. In case there is any problem on PPC, sparc or whatever I'll |
43 |
> try to modify the ebuild :) |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> PS If you are aware of any other spam-filter tool which you consider |
47 |
> worth looking at, please tell! |
48 |
> I know about Spam-Assassin, which is just too big IMHO, spamprobe, |
49 |
> based |
50 |
> on Bayesian methods, but unusable to filter each and every mail on a |
51 |
> production system, even a small one with only a few active users. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
>-- |
55 |
> Javier Marcet <jmarcet@×××××.com> |
56 |
|
57 |
-- |
58 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |