Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Javier Marcet <jmarcet@×××××.com>
To: Evan Read <eread@×××××××××.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] bayesiam SPAM filter 'bogofilter' ebuild on bugzilla
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:59:25
Message-Id: 20021109000008.GB24065@jerry.marcet.dyndns.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] bayesiam SPAM filter 'bogofilter' ebuild on bugzilla by Evan Read
1 * Evan Read <eread@×××××××××.org> [021109 00:22]:
2
3 >Well, I had already done one.
4
5 >See: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828 for bogofilter and
6 >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8827 for Judy.
7
8 >I had been waiting for the "unfreeze" for them to be included and then
9 >for my exams to finish so I could "Gentoo-ise" them more. Based on the
10 >numbers, you will see they have been in the pipe along time
11
12 >I like your ebuilds, but they are dups of mine. They are more
13 >"gentoo-ised" than mine.
14
15 >So while I am happy that yours came along, I would have preferred you
16 >check to see if existing work was there and work on that and test
17 >that. All your difference look good and I will be sure to test them.
18
19 Hereby I would like to publicly apologize for not having looked through
20 bugzilla's database for a previous committed bogofilter ebuild.
21 Mea culpa, I really didn't know about Evan's ebuilds.
22
23 As I told Evan in a personal mail the only difference being worth a look
24 in the ebuilds I sent is a fix for a typo in bogofilter's man pages,
25 which show '-n' and '-N' as command line options for non-spam, when the
26 really are '-h' and '-H' - for ham mail -. Other than that, they're
27 basically the same.
28
29 As I also said in that e-mail I sent to Evan, don't you think a better
30 interface to commit new ebuilds, being considered for inclusion in the
31 official tree, or just to use by those willing to try out something too
32 unstable - e.g. CVS versions -, might be nice? Something like a ebuilds
33 'alt' repository where non-core Gentoo developers might send theirs, as
34 core developers might have their non-official packages, kde-cvs or
35 gnome-2 in the past come to my mind.
36 I find bugzilla a bit awkward for this task, it is right to file bugs,
37 but to search new ebuilds to try or even to be aware of those new
38 submissions has ample space for improvement, IMHO.
39
40 What do you think? Shall we try setting up something for the task? One
41 could always put up his/her web page with non-official ebuilds, but
42 something to join efforts would be nicer.
43
44
45 --
46 Javier Marcet <jmarcet@×××××.com>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] bayesiam SPAM filter 'bogofilter' ebuild on bugzilla Evan Read <eread@×××××××××.org>