| 1 |
On Monday 06 September 2004 01:44, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:00:45AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi all - |
| 4 |
> > Recent [1] announcements [2] from other large projects have prompted |
| 5 |
> > this inquiry - should Gentoo adopt similar policies regarding Sender ID |
| 6 |
> > and make a public statement or is it not worth our time? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I left Debian in large part because of the stupid politics that went on in |
| 9 |
> that project. I want a distribution that bases its decisions on technical |
| 10 |
> reasons, rather than political ones. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Also, for the record, regardless of what decisions are made regarding |
| 13 |
> including support for SenderID in portage, we *will* be implementing |
| 14 |
> SenderID on our infrastructure. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> --kurt |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Just out of curiosity; what functionality does Sender ID provide that Sender |
| 19 |
Policy Framework (SPF) doesn't? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives