| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Can we please get a consistent answer on 2.6 kernels when it comes to |
| 5 |
sparc? We used to have sparc-development-sources, which we were told to |
| 6 |
consolidate into development-sources. Now today with absolutely 0 |
| 7 |
notification what-so-ever, our patchsets to development-sources were |
| 8 |
yanked because it wasn't the appropriate place. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
So what is the appropriate place? Can you as a team please come up with a |
| 11 |
singular answer and at least consult all those who will be effected |
| 12 |
*before* you change your mind and implement those changes? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thanks, |
| 15 |
- -- |
| 16 |
Jason Wever |
| 17 |
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
iD8DBQFA7wrbdKvgdVioq28RAo1cAJ9EevkQSkzWwR58MSIjyxIfB6P7QwCeP9gS |
| 22 |
iFLgXIi15hv+E3JOn/OVIIs= |
| 23 |
=Fo3y |
| 24 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives