| 1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> Neither this version nor the one you posted in your previous message |
| 4 |
>> is reasonable as a news item. A news item should be descriptive and |
| 5 |
>> self-contained (at least to some degree). It's o.k. to include links |
| 6 |
>> pointing to further information, but that shouldn't be the only |
| 7 |
>> contents. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> What is your suggestion? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Include at least a short summary of the upgrade guide's key points in |
| 12 |
the news item. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Lets compare it with the 2.32 one that looks to were valid in the |
| 15 |
> past: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That we had less than optimal news items in the past doesn't mean that |
| 18 |
we shouldn't do better now. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Ulrich |
Archives